613 Climate & Radiation Laboratory Special Seminar: David Peterson

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences University of Nebraska – Lincoln

David Peterson1, Jun Wang1, Charles Ichoku2, Edward Hyer3, Vincent Ambrosia4

  1. Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE
  2. Laboratory for Atmospheres, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD
  3. Marine Meteorology Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Monterey, CA
  4. NASA-Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA


Abstract

Developed as a quantitative measurement of fire intensity, fire radiative power (FRP) and the potential applications to smoke plume injection heights, are currently limited by the pixel resolution of a satellite sensor. As a result, this study develops a new sub-pixel-based calculation of fire radiative power (FRPf) for fire pixels detected at 1 km2 nominal spatial resolution by the MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) fire detection algorithm (collection 5), which is subsequently applied to several large wildfire events in California. While based on the heritage of earlier bi-spectral retrievals of sub-pixel fire area and temperature, the current investigation incorporates a radiative transfer model to remove solar effects and account for atmospheric effects as a function of Earth-satellite geometry at 3.96 and 11 µm (MODIS fire detection channels). The retrieved sub-pixel fire (flaming) area is assessed via the multispectral, high-resolution data (3-50 meters) obtained from the Autonomous Modular Sensor (AMS), flown aboard the NASA Ikhana unmanned aircraft. With fire sizes ranging from 0.001 to 0.02 km2, pixel-level fire area comparisons between MODIS and AMS are highly variable, regardless of the viewing zenith angle, and show a low bias with a modest correlation (R = 0.59). However, when lower confidence fire pixels and point-spread-function effects (hot spots on the pixel edge) are removed, the correlation becomes much stronger (R = 0.84) and the variability between MODIS and AMS is reduced. To account for these random errors via averaging, two clustering techniques are employed and the resulting AMS and MODIS comparisons of fire area are even more encouraging (R = 0.91). Drawing from the retrieved fire area and temperature, the FRPf is calculated and compared to the current MODIS pixel area-based FRP. While the two methods are strongly correlated (R = 0.93), the FRPf, in combination with retrieved fire cluster area, allows a large fire burning at a low intensity to be separated from a small fire burning at a high intensity. A sensitivity analysis reveals that regions of dry, brown vegetation may increase the potential for error via the background emissivity, but the retrieval is more sensitive the column water vapor content and small errors in the 11 µm background temperature. Additional tests are preformed using a recent wildfire case study in Texas and the potential applications to fire weather studies are also explored.